Explosive Assets Radar

Home / Investments / Investors in start-ups like ours

The trail of a rocket launch in the night sky

Active analysis

Investors in start-ups like ours

22 international investors that have backed start-ups like ours, scored on 14 adapted conditions: fresh capital, the right cheque, a matching thesis, access from Romania.

Photo: SpaceX / Unsplash

Questions the analysis answers

An open invitation to all 22

Dear investors, we have done for you what we do for every asset: we looked for the substance behind the reputation, condition by condition, with a source for every score. We did it because a start-up like ours depends most on exactly the people on this list.

So we invite you, publicly and with respect, to do the same for us. Three things, any of them is welcome:

  1. Check your score. If a score is wrong, send us the correct value with a source. We publish the correction within 7 days and say who asked for it.
  2. Score us on the same 14 conditions. Our own assessment is below, without embellishment. Yours would be worth more than ours.
  3. Evaluate a direct collaboration. An investment, a programme, a data partnership or simply a 20-minute call. We publish the outcome only with your consent.

One rule protects both sides: a reply, a collaboration or an investment does not change any score. Only factual corrections with a source change scores, and every change is visible in the snapshots.

Reply to the invitation

Open since 5 November 2026 to all 22 investors. Replies, corrections and the scores you give us are published below as they arrive.

Us, on the same 14 conditions

Our self-assessment on the radar’s general set: 7 of 14 conditions met, score 6.12. Honestly: the substance is in the method and the structure, the form we still owe is revenue, users and a team. That is precisely where an investor makes the difference. Substance being confirmed

Radar Active Explozive · 7/14 · score 6.12
#ConditionScoreIn plain words
C1Actually used3No users or revenue yet to prove demand; it is mostly a promise.
Data: Site live, free, no revenue yet.
C2Launch from strength6The launch timing says nothing special, good or bad.
Data: Launched with a working product, self-funded, without investor pressure.
C3Healthy funding8Healthy funding: no investors able to flood the market.
Data: No investors and no debt.
C4Attracts skilled people4Attracts few skilled people, partners or new developers.
Data: Small team; we are looking for partners and builders.
C5Real customers—Cannot be assessed yet (for example, the asset is not publicly traded).
Data: Too early: users are not yet publicly measured, so we give ourselves no score.
C6Credible team7Credible team: has delivered and has no scandals.
Data: Founder with 22+ years of IT project delivery (PMP, PRINCE2).
C7Well-distributed supply9Well-distributed supply: few new shares or tokens ready to flood the market.
Data: 100% founders: nobody can sell massively.
C8Organic community—Cannot be assessed yet (for example, the asset is not publicly traded).
Data: Too early: the community is just forming, so we give ourselves no score.
C9Obvious problem8Obvious problem: explained in one sentence, and people feel it.
Data: Explained in one sentence: the substance behind the price, with a source for every figure.
C10Good entry price9Good entry price: cheap versus rivals, its peak or what it produces.
Data: Pre-seed stage: the best entry price.
C11Balanced media7Balanced attention: neither ignored nor in euphoria.
Data: Small, balanced attention.
C12Healthy price and volume—Cannot be assessed yet (for example, the asset is not publicly traded).
Data: Not traded: cannot be assessed.
C13Few on the same bet8Few on the same bet: still room for new buyers.
Data: Few platforms publicly score every asset class, with sources.
C14Low risks6A few risks to watch, nothing serious.
Data: Market rules (we give no personal advice) and dependence on one founder.

The investors on the radar

22 international investors that have backed start-ups like ours (fintech, financial data, capital markets, financial education), scored on 14 adapted conditions with the same weights as the rest of the radar. Each score rests on public sources, listed for each investor. The scores are frozen in the snapshot of 5 November 2026 (fingerprint in the .sha256 file). “Conditions” measures how well each investor fits a start-up like ours, not how good the investor is in general.

#InvestorTypeWhereFirst chequeConditionsScoreSubstance / form
1Fil Rouge CapitalPre-seed fund and acceleratorZagreb; office in BucharestEUR 50k–350k12/147.28Substance without form
2SeedcampSeed fund (first cheque)London, New York; invests across EuropeUSD 350k–1.25m11/147.82Substance confirmed
3Bloomberg BetaSeed fund, Bloomberg capitalSan Francisco, New YorkUSD 250k–2m11/147.14Substance confirmed
4Y CombinatorAcceleratorSan Francisco; applications worldwideUSD 500k (standard deal)10/147.78Substance confirmed
5Credo VenturesCEE pre-seed fundPrague, Krakow; CEE and diasporaUSD 1–5m10/147.58Substance without form
6SpeedinvestSeed fund with a fintech teamVienna; Europe including CEEEUR 50k–1.5m10/147.30Substance without form
7EBRD Star VentureSupport programme (advisory grant)26 countries, including Romaniaadvisory grant of up to EUR 40k9/147.24Substance without form
8Startup Wise GuysB2B and fintech acceleratorTallinn; Romanian programme with the EBRDup to EUR 65k9/146.96Substance without form
9Inovo Venture PartnersCEE seed fundWarsaw; CEE and diasporaEUR 0.5–4m9/146.82Substance without form
10QED InvestorsFintech-only fundUS, UK, Latin America, IndiaUSD 1–3m at seed8/147.02Substance confirmed
11Bek Ventures (formerly Earlybird Digital East)Seed and Series A fundIstanbul; CEE and Turkeyseed and Series A, large cheques7/146.74Substance without form
12Point NineB2B and AI seed fundBerlin; invests globallyEUR 0.5–3m7/146.64Substance confirmed
13CommerzVenturesFintech fund (Commerzbank capital)Frankfurt; Europe, US, Israel, AfricaSeries A and B7/146.52Substance confirmed
14OTB VenturesEarly-growth fundWarsaw, Luxembourg; Europeup to USD 15m7/146.36Substance being confirmed
15EIC Accelerator (European Commission)EU grant and equityEU, including Romaniagrant up to EUR 2.5m; equity EUR 0.5–10m7/146.14Substance being confirmed
16Finch CapitalFintech fundAmsterdam, LondonEUR 2–10m7/146.14Substance being confirmed
17TechstarsAcceleratorGlobal; the Anywhere programme is remoteUSD 220k6/146.66Substance confirmed
18Anthemis GroupFintech fundLondon, New YorkUSD 1–5m6/146.40Substance confirmed
19DB1 Ventures (Deutsche Börse)Corporate fund (Frankfurt exchange)Frankfurt; EuropeEUR 5–25m5/146.40Substance being confirmed
20500 Emerging EuropePre-seed and seed fundPoland, Romania, the Baltics, Turkeyup to EUR 1m4/146.32Substance without form
21Nasdaq VenturesCorporate fund (Nasdaq exchange)New York; US and Europeunder USD 1m–10m4/146.30Substance being confirmed
22Augmentum FintechListed fintech fund, taken over in 2026London; UK and Europerounds of a few million pounds1/144.70Form without substance

Each investor, condition by condition

Fil Rouge Capital · EUR 50k–350k · 12/14 · score 7.28 · Substance without form

A Croatian fund that officially entered Romania in 2025, with its EUR 60 million FRC3 fund and a Romanian venture partner, Matei Dumitrescu. It writes EUR 50,000–350,000 pre-seed cheques, exactly our stage, with follow-ons of up to EUR 4 million. It has no large known exits yet.

#ConditionScoreIn plain words
C1Really invests8Invests actively: new deals in the last 12 months.
C2Fresh fund available8A recently closed fund with money to invest.
C3Fair terms7Fair, public and standard terms.
C4Network and help7A strong network: mentors, co-investors, customers.
C5Follow-on investing7Has reserves and follows its companies.
C6Proven record5A few good exits.
C7Right ticket9The first cheque fits a pre-seed or seed start-up.
C8Founders come back7Founders come back, recommend it or invest in it.
C9Thesis fits5Generalist: our sector is possible, not preferred.
C10Access for us10Invests in Romania or CEE, with open applications.
C11Media (non-linear)7Balanced attention.
C12Investment pace7A rising pace of new investments.
C13Crowding (inverse)7Few founders competing for the same attention.
C14Low risks7Low risks.

Sources: Business Forum, Fil Rouge Capital intră în România; Ziarul Financiar, tichete între 50.000 și 350.000 €

Fil Rouge Capital: correct your score, score us or propose a call →

Seedcamp · USD 350k–1.25m · 11/14 · score 7.82 · Substance confirmed

First investor in Revolut and Wise and one of the first in UiPath. In June 2026 it raised USD 320 million: 220 for first cheques and 100 for follow-ons. 80 portfolio founders invested in Fund VII themselves. The minus for us: the new fund leans towards AI, deep tech and physical science, and competition for their attention is high.

#ConditionScoreIn plain words
C1Really invests9Invests actively: new deals in the last 12 months.
C2Fresh fund available10A recently closed fund with money to invest.
C3Fair terms7Fair, public and standard terms.
C4Network and help9A strong network: mentors, co-investors, customers.
C5Follow-on investing9Has reserves and follows its companies.
C6Proven record10Major exits and companies grown from the start.
C7Right ticket7The first cheque fits a pre-seed or seed start-up.
C8Founders come back9Founders come back, recommend it or invest in it.
C9Thesis fits5Generalist: our sector is possible, not preferred.
C10Access for us7Invests in Romania or CEE, with open applications.
C11Media (non-linear)5Moderate attention.
C12Investment pace8A rising pace of new investments.
C13Crowding (inverse)4Very selective: acceptance below 1-2%.
C14Low risks8Low risks.

Sources: TechCrunch, Seedcamp strânge 320 mil. $ (iunie 2026); F4 Fund, profilul Seedcamp

Seedcamp: correct your score, score us or propose a call →

Bloomberg Beta · USD 250k–2m · 11/14 · score 7.14 · Substance confirmed

Bloomberg’s seed fund, created in 2013 with the stated mission of producing insights from data. It publishes its operating manual and measures itself by how founders rate it. It invested as recently as January 2026, from Fund V. The minus: it invests almost only in North America.

#ConditionScoreIn plain words
C1Really invests8Invests actively: new deals in the last 12 months.
C2Fresh fund available7A recently closed fund with money to invest.
C3Fair terms9Fair, public and standard terms.
C4Network and help8A strong network: mentors, co-investors, customers.
C5Follow-on investing7Has reserves and follows its companies.
C6Proven record8Major exits and companies grown from the start.
C7Right ticket7The first cheque fits a pre-seed or seed start-up.
C8Founders come back8Founders come back, recommend it or invest in it.
C9Thesis fits7Invests exactly in fintech, financial data or education.
C10Access for us3Does not invest in our region.
C11Media (non-linear)6Moderate attention.
C12Investment pace7A rising pace of new investments.
C13Crowding (inverse)5Moderate competition.
C14Low risks8Low risks.

Sources: Bloomberg, Bloomberg Beta; F4 Fund, profilul Bloomberg Beta

Bloomberg Beta: correct your score, score us or propose a call →

Y Combinator · USD 500k (standard deal) · 10/14 · score 7.78 · Substance confirmed

The most powerful accelerator in the world, with Stripe and Coinbase among its alumni. It offers a public USD 500,000 standard deal and in 2026 held dedicated fintech interviews in New York. The problem is crowding: fewer than 1% of applicants get in.

#ConditionScoreIn plain words
C1Really invests10Invests actively: new deals in the last 12 months.
C2Fresh fund available8A recently closed fund with money to invest.
C3Fair terms7Fair, public and standard terms.
C4Network and help10A strong network: mentors, co-investors, customers.
C5Follow-on investing6Sometimes follows on.
C6Proven record10Major exits and companies grown from the start.
C7Right ticket8The first cheque fits a pre-seed or seed start-up.
C8Founders come back9Founders come back, recommend it or invest in it.
C9Thesis fits7Invests exactly in fintech, financial data or education.
C10Access for us6Invests in Europe, rarely in Romania.
C11Media (non-linear)4A name so famous that it draws thousands of applications.
C12Investment pace9A rising pace of new investments.
C13Crowding (inverse)2Very selective: acceptance below 1-2%.
C14Low risks8Low risks.

Sources: The Block, YC interviuri fintech la New York (2026); Yespress, profilul Y Combinator

Y Combinator: correct your score, score us or propose a call →

Credo Ventures · USD 1–5m · 10/14 · score 7.58 · Substance without form

Led or co-led the pre-seed rounds of UiPath and ElevenLabs. Fund 5, USD 88 million, closed in March 2026 and targets 7-8 new investments a year in founders from Central and Eastern Europe. It is a generalist and prefers technical founders; the USD 1-5 million cheque is above what an early start-up needs.

#ConditionScoreIn plain words
C1Really invests9Invests actively: new deals in the last 12 months.
C2Fresh fund available9A recently closed fund with money to invest.
C3Fair terms7Fair, public and standard terms.
C4Network and help8A strong network: mentors, co-investors, customers.
C5Follow-on investing7Has reserves and follows its companies.
C6Proven record10Major exits and companies grown from the start.
C7Right ticket6The first cheque is at the upper limit of what we need.
C8Founders come back7Founders come back, recommend it or invest in it.
C9Thesis fits5Generalist: our sector is possible, not preferred.
C10Access for us9Invests in Romania or CEE, with open applications.
C11Media (non-linear)6Moderate attention.
C12Investment pace7A rising pace of new investments.
C13Crowding (inverse)5Moderate competition.
C14Low risks8Low risks.

Sources: Tech.eu, Credo Stage 5 (martie 2026); Credo Ventures

Credo Ventures: correct your score, score us or propose a call →

Speedinvest · EUR 50k–1.5m · 10/14 · score 7.30 · Substance without form

Has a dedicated fintech team and invested early in Bitpanda, an investment platform, and in Tide. It backed 233 European companies between 2011 and 2026 and made new investments as recently as July 2026. The risk to watch: in 2025 it cut its team by 10%.

#ConditionScoreIn plain words
C1Really invests9Invests actively: new deals in the last 12 months.
C2Fresh fund available7A recently closed fund with money to invest.
C3Fair terms7Fair, public and standard terms.
C4Network and help8A strong network: mentors, co-investors, customers.
C5Follow-on investing8Has reserves and follows its companies.
C6Proven record8Major exits and companies grown from the start.
C7Right ticket7The first cheque fits a pre-seed or seed start-up.
C8Founders come back6A good reputation among founders.
C9Thesis fits8Invests exactly in fintech, financial data or education.
C10Access for us7Invests in Romania or CEE, with open applications.
C11Media (non-linear)6Moderate attention.
C12Investment pace7A rising pace of new investments.
C13Crowding (inverse)5Moderate competition.
C14Low risks6A few risks to watch.

Sources: Tech.eu Funding, profilul Speedinvest; PitchBook, Speedinvest

Speedinvest: correct your score, score us or propose a call →

EBRD Star Venture · advisory grant of up to EUR 40k · 9/14 · score 7.24 · Substance without form

It takes no equity: it offers strategic advisory grants of about EUR 40,000, mentoring and access to finance. It has supported more than 550 companies, and the 2025 Romanian edition selected 5 start-ups. The EBRD also invests indirectly, through funds such as GapMinder Fund II.

#ConditionScoreIn plain words
C1Really invests7Invests actively: new deals in the last 12 months.
C2Fresh fund available6A fund still deploying, without fresh capital.
C3Fair terms9Fair, public and standard terms.
C4Network and help8A strong network: mentors, co-investors, customers.
C5Follow-on investing5Sometimes follows on.
C6Proven record7Major exits and companies grown from the start.
C7Right ticket9The first cheque fits a pre-seed or seed start-up.
C8Founders come back6A good reputation among founders.
C9Thesis fits5Generalist: our sector is possible, not preferred.
C10Access for us9Invests in Romania or CEE, with open applications.
C11Media (non-linear)7Balanced attention.
C12Investment pace6A steady pace.
C13Crowding (inverse)7Few founders competing for the same attention.
C14Low risks9Low risks.

Sources: Romania Insider, EBRD Star Venture 2025; EBRD, investiția în GapMinder Fund II

EBRD Star Venture: correct your score, score us or propose a call →

Startup Wise Guys · up to EUR 65k · 9/14 · score 6.96 · Substance without form

An accelerator with a dedicated fintech programme and more than 700 investments, which launched an accelerator in Romania together with the EBRD. The small cheque fits our stage, but the terms are expensive: up to 12% of the company for about EUR 65,000 in cash and programme.

#ConditionScoreIn plain words
C1Really invests8Invests actively: new deals in the last 12 months.
C2Fresh fund available5A fund still deploying, without fresh capital.
C3Fair terms5Usual terms, without special transparency.
C4Network and help8A strong network: mentors, co-investors, customers.
C5Follow-on investing5Sometimes follows on.
C6Proven record5A few good exits.
C7Right ticket9The first cheque fits a pre-seed or seed start-up.
C8Founders come back6A good reputation among founders.
C9Thesis fits8Invests exactly in fintech, financial data or education.
C10Access for us8Invests in Romania or CEE, with open applications.
C11Media (non-linear)7Balanced attention.
C12Investment pace7A rising pace of new investments.
C13Crowding (inverse)7Few founders competing for the same attention.
C14Low risks7Low risks.

Sources: The Recursive, Startup Wise Guys strânge 25 mil. €; Startup Intros, Startup Wise Guys 2026

Startup Wise Guys: correct your score, score us or propose a call →

Inovo Venture Partners · EUR 0.5–4m · 9/14 · score 6.82 · Substance without form

One of the region’s largest seed funds (EUR 105 million, 2023), with Booksy and Preply in its portfolio. It invested as recently as February 2026, but Fund III is already largely invested (28 of about 38 companies).

#ConditionScoreIn plain words
C1Really invests8Invests actively: new deals in the last 12 months.
C2Fresh fund available5A fund still deploying, without fresh capital.
C3Fair terms7Fair, public and standard terms.
C4Network and help7A strong network: mentors, co-investors, customers.
C5Follow-on investing7Has reserves and follows its companies.
C6Proven record8Major exits and companies grown from the start.
C7Right ticket7The first cheque fits a pre-seed or seed start-up.
C8Founders come back7Founders come back, recommend it or invest in it.
C9Thesis fits5Generalist: our sector is possible, not preferred.
C10Access for us7Invests in Romania or CEE, with open applications.
C11Media (non-linear)6Moderate attention.
C12Investment pace6A steady pace.
C13Crowding (inverse)6Moderate competition.
C14Low risks7Low risks.

Sources: Tech.eu, Inovo Fund III; F4 Fund, profilul Inovo

Inovo Venture Partners: correct your score, score us or propose a call →

QED Investors · USD 1–3m at seed · 8/14 · score 7.02 · Substance confirmed

Has invested only in fintech since 2007, with more than 200 companies and 28 unicorns, including Nubank and Credit Karma. The thesis is the closest to ours, but it does not invest in Central and Eastern Europe, and seed cheques start at a million dollars.

#ConditionScoreIn plain words
C1Really invests8Invests actively: new deals in the last 12 months.
C2Fresh fund available6A fund still deploying, without fresh capital.
C3Fair terms7Fair, public and standard terms.
C4Network and help9A strong network: mentors, co-investors, customers.
C5Follow-on investing9Has reserves and follows its companies.
C6Proven record10Major exits and companies grown from the start.
C7Right ticket4The first cheque is far too large for a start-up like ours.
C8Founders come back8Founders come back, recommend it or invest in it.
C9Thesis fits9Invests exactly in fintech, financial data or education.
C10Access for us2Does not invest in our region.
C11Media (non-linear)6Moderate attention.
C12Investment pace6A steady pace.
C13Crowding (inverse)4Very selective: acceptance below 1-2%.
C14Low risks8Low risks.

Sources: Crowdfund Insider, QED închide aproape 1 mld. $; F4 Fund, profilul QED

QED Investors: correct your score, score us or propose a call →

Bek Ventures (formerly Earlybird Digital East) · seed and Series A, large cheques · 7/14 · score 6.74 · Substance without form

The team that invested early in UiPath, with Romanian partner Dan Lupu; its first fund returned about 20 times the money. In 2024 it rebranded as Bek Ventures and raised a USD 250 million fund. It invested in FintechOS and Payhawk, but its cheques are for companies with traction.

#ConditionScoreIn plain words
C1Really invests6Invests, but at a slow or unclear pace.
C2Fresh fund available8A recently closed fund with money to invest.
C3Fair terms7Fair, public and standard terms.
C4Network and help7A strong network: mentors, co-investors, customers.
C5Follow-on investing8Has reserves and follows its companies.
C6Proven record10Major exits and companies grown from the start.
C7Right ticket4The first cheque is far too large for a start-up like ours.
C8Founders come back6A good reputation among founders.
C9Thesis fits6Generalist: our sector is possible, not preferred.
C10Access for us8Invests in Romania or CEE, with open applications.
C11Media (non-linear)6Moderate attention.
C12Investment pace6A steady pace.
C13Crowding (inverse)6Moderate competition.
C14Low risks7Low risks.

Sources: Bloomberg, Earlybird Digital East devine Bek Ventures; The Recursive, investiții în FintechOS și Payhawk

Bek Ventures: correct your score, score us or propose a call →

Point Nine · EUR 0.5–3m · 7/14 · score 6.64 · Substance confirmed

An early investor in Revolut and Delivery Hero, known for SaaS and B2B marketplaces. In 2026 it shifted its thesis towards AI, and cheques start at EUR 500,000, above what a start-up like ours needs now.

#ConditionScoreIn plain words
C1Really invests8Invests actively: new deals in the last 12 months.
C2Fresh fund available5A fund still deploying, without fresh capital.
C3Fair terms7Fair, public and standard terms.
C4Network and help8A strong network: mentors, co-investors, customers.
C5Follow-on investing8Has reserves and follows its companies.
C6Proven record9Major exits and companies grown from the start.
C7Right ticket5The first cheque is at the upper limit of what we need.
C8Founders come back7Founders come back, recommend it or invest in it.
C9Thesis fits4Its thesis is elsewhere (for example, deep tech or defence).
C10Access for us5Invests in Europe, rarely in Romania.
C11Media (non-linear)6Moderate attention.
C12Investment pace6A steady pace.
C13Crowding (inverse)5Moderate competition.
C14Low risks7Low risks.

Sources: Sifted, Point Nine strânge 180 mil. €; Incubator List, Point Nine

Point Nine: correct your score, score us or propose a call →

CommerzVentures · Series A and B · 7/14 · score 6.52 · Substance confirmed

A fintech fund with EUR 550 million, an early investor in eToro and Marqeta. It invested as recently as February 2026. The thesis is very close, but it comes in at Series A and B, so only once a start-up has clear revenue.

#ConditionScoreIn plain words
C1Really invests8Invests actively: new deals in the last 12 months.
C2Fresh fund available5A fund still deploying, without fresh capital.
C3Fair terms7Fair, public and standard terms.
C4Network and help7A strong network: mentors, co-investors, customers.
C5Follow-on investing7Has reserves and follows its companies.
C6Proven record9Major exits and companies grown from the start.
C7Right ticket2The first cheque is far too large for a start-up like ours.
C8Founders come back6A good reputation among founders.
C9Thesis fits9Invests exactly in fintech, financial data or education.
C10Access for us4Does not invest in our region.
C11Media (non-linear)6Moderate attention.
C12Investment pace6A steady pace.
C13Crowding (inverse)6Moderate competition.
C14Low risks7Low risks.

Sources: Silicon Canals, CommerzVentures fondul III; CB Insights, CommerzVentures

CommerzVentures: correct your score, score us or propose a call →

OTB Ventures · up to USD 15m · 7/14 · score 6.36 · Substance being confirmed

Invested in Romania’s FintechOS and has a separate fund for follow-on rounds. In 2025-2026, however, it moved towards defence and sovereign AI, and it invests in companies with revenue, with large cheques.

#ConditionScoreIn plain words
C1Really invests8Invests actively: new deals in the last 12 months.
C2Fresh fund available6A fund still deploying, without fresh capital.
C3Fair terms7Fair, public and standard terms.
C4Network and help7A strong network: mentors, co-investors, customers.
C5Follow-on investing8Has reserves and follows its companies.
C6Proven record7Major exits and companies grown from the start.
C7Right ticket2The first cheque is far too large for a start-up like ours.
C8Founders come back6A good reputation among founders.
C9Thesis fits4Its thesis is elsewhere (for example, deep tech or defence).
C10Access for us7Invests in Romania or CEE, with open applications.
C11Media (non-linear)6Moderate attention.
C12Investment pace6A steady pace.
C13Crowding (inverse)6Moderate competition.
C14Low risks7Low risks.

Sources: The Recursive, OTB Growth Fund I și FintechOS; F4 Fund, profilul OTB Ventures

OTB Ventures: correct your score, score us or propose a call →

EIC Accelerator (European Commission) · grant up to EUR 2.5m; equity EUR 0.5–10m · 7/14 · score 6.14 · Substance being confirmed

The European programme that combines grants with equity investment; in February 2026 it selected 61 companies, with EUR 467 million. It has also funded Romanian start-ups. For us it is hard: the programme is for deep tech at technology readiness level 6-8, and the success rate is about 6%.

#ConditionScoreIn plain words
C1Really invests8Invests actively: new deals in the last 12 months.
C2Fresh fund available8A recently closed fund with money to invest.
C3Fair terms7Fair, public and standard terms.
C4Network and help6A useful network, without special programmes.
C5Follow-on investing7Has reserves and follows its companies.
C6Proven record6A few good exits.
C7Right ticket3The first cheque is far too large for a start-up like ours.
C8Founders come back5A good reputation among founders.
C9Thesis fits2Its thesis is elsewhere (for example, deep tech or defence).
C10Access for us7Invests in Romania or CEE, with open applications.
C11Media (non-linear)6Moderate attention.
C12Investment pace7A rising pace of new investments.
C13Crowding (inverse)3Very selective: acceptance below 1-2%.
C14Low risks8Low risks.

Sources: EIC, 61 de companii selectate (februarie 2026); Romania Insider, Amsimcel finanțat de EIC

EIC Accelerator: correct your score, score us or propose a call →

Finch Capital · EUR 2–10m · 7/14 · score 6.14 · Substance being confirmed

A fintech fund that publishes the yearly report on European fintech and invested as recently as 2026. Its EUR 150 million Europe III fund, however, comes in at Series A and B, in companies with EUR 2-5 million in revenue.

#ConditionScoreIn plain words
C1Really invests7Invests actively: new deals in the last 12 months.
C2Fresh fund available5A fund still deploying, without fresh capital.
C3Fair terms7Fair, public and standard terms.
C4Network and help7A strong network: mentors, co-investors, customers.
C5Follow-on investing7Has reserves and follows its companies.
C6Proven record7Major exits and companies grown from the start.
C7Right ticket2The first cheque is far too large for a start-up like ours.
C8Founders come back6A good reputation among founders.
C9Thesis fits8Invests exactly in fintech, financial data or education.
C10Access for us4Does not invest in our region.
C11Media (non-linear)6Moderate attention.
C12Investment pace6A steady pace.
C13Crowding (inverse)6Moderate competition.
C14Low risks7Low risks.

Sources: Tech.eu, Finch Capital Europe III; CB Insights, Finch Capital

Finch Capital: correct your score, score us or propose a call →

Techstars · USD 220k · 6/14 · score 6.66 · Substance confirmed

An accelerator with more than 10,000 mentors and fintech-focused programmes, including New York and London. Techstars Anywhere can be done remotely, so also from Romania. The investment is USD 220,000, for about 5% plus a SAFE. Acceptance is around 1%.

#ConditionScoreIn plain words
C1Really invests8Invests actively: new deals in the last 12 months.
C2Fresh fund available6A fund still deploying, without fresh capital.
C3Fair terms6Usual terms, without special transparency.
C4Network and help9A strong network: mentors, co-investors, customers.
C5Follow-on investing5Sometimes follows on.
C6Proven record7Major exits and companies grown from the start.
C7Right ticket8The first cheque fits a pre-seed or seed start-up.
C8Founders come back7Founders come back, recommend it or invest in it.
C9Thesis fits6Generalist: our sector is possible, not preferred.
C10Access for us7Invests in Romania or CEE, with open applications.
C11Media (non-linear)6Moderate attention.
C12Investment pace6A steady pace.
C13Crowding (inverse)3Very selective: acceptance below 1-2%.
C14Low risks6A few risks to watch.

Sources: Techstars, termenii investiției; Startup Intros, Techstars Anywhere toamna 2026

Techstars: correct your score, score us or propose a call →

Anthemis Group · USD 1–5m · 6/14 · score 6.40 · Substance confirmed

Considered the first fund dedicated to fintech, an early investor in Betterment, and with the largest fund for women-founded fintech. It made 7 investments in 2025, but has broadened its thesis towards climate, health and AI, and its last large fund dates from 2021.

#ConditionScoreIn plain words
C1Really invests7Invests actively: new deals in the last 12 months.
C2Fresh fund available5A fund still deploying, without fresh capital.
C3Fair terms7Fair, public and standard terms.
C4Network and help8A strong network: mentors, co-investors, customers.
C5Follow-on investing7Has reserves and follows its companies.
C6Proven record7Major exits and companies grown from the start.
C7Right ticket6The first cheque is at the upper limit of what we need.
C8Founders come back6A good reputation among founders.
C9Thesis fits8Invests exactly in fintech, financial data or education.
C10Access for us4Does not invest in our region.
C11Media (non-linear)6Moderate attention.
C12Investment pace5A steady pace.
C13Crowding (inverse)6Moderate competition.
C14Low risks6A few risks to watch.

Sources: F4 Fund, profilul Anthemis; Finextra, Anthemis strânge 700 mil. $

Anthemis Group: correct your score, score us or propose a call →

DB1 Ventures (Deutsche Börse) · EUR 5–25m · 5/14 · score 6.40 · Substance being confirmed

Deutsche Börse’s investment arm, with EUR 400 million, focused on capital-markets infrastructure. In April 2026 it invested in Performativ, an investment-management platform. The theme fits, but the EUR 5 million minimum cheque is for mature companies.

#ConditionScoreIn plain words
C1Really invests8Invests actively: new deals in the last 12 months.
C2Fresh fund available6A fund still deploying, without fresh capital.
C3Fair terms6Usual terms, without special transparency.
C4Network and help8A strong network: mentors, co-investors, customers.
C5Follow-on investing6Sometimes follows on.
C6Proven record7Major exits and companies grown from the start.
C7Right ticket1The first cheque is far too large for a start-up like ours.
C8Founders come back5A good reputation among founders.
C9Thesis fits9Invests exactly in fintech, financial data or education.
C10Access for us5Invests in Europe, rarely in Romania.
C11Media (non-linear)6Moderate attention.
C12Investment pace6A steady pace.
C13Crowding (inverse)6Moderate competition.
C14Low risks8Low risks.

Sources: Deutsche Börse, DB1 Ventures; Deutsche Börse, investiția în Performativ (aprilie 2026)

DB1 Ventures: correct your score, score us or propose a call →

500 Emerging Europe · up to EUR 1m · 4/14 · score 6.32 · Substance without form

The regional arm of 500 Global, with Romania among its priority markets and cheques of up to EUR 1 million for 5-10% of the company. Fund II dates from 2022, and we found little public information about recent investments, so the activity scores are cautious.

#ConditionScoreIn plain words
C1Really invests6Invests, but at a slow or unclear pace.
C2Fresh fund available5A fund still deploying, without fresh capital.
C3Fair terms7Fair, public and standard terms.
C4Network and help8A strong network: mentors, co-investors, customers.
C5Follow-on investing6Sometimes follows on.
C6Proven record6A few good exits.
C7Right ticket8The first cheque fits a pre-seed or seed start-up.
C8Founders come back6A good reputation among founders.
C9Thesis fits5Generalist: our sector is possible, not preferred.
C10Access for us8Invests in Romania or CEE, with open applications.
C11Media (non-linear)6Moderate attention.
C12Investment pace5A steady pace.
C13Crowding (inverse)6Moderate competition.
C14Low risks6A few risks to watch.

Sources: InforCapital, 500 Emerging Europe Fund II; Seedtable, 500 Emerging Europe

500 Emerging Europe: correct your score, score us or propose a call →

Nasdaq Ventures · under USD 1m–10m · 4/14 · score 6.30 · Substance being confirmed

The investment arm of the Nasdaq exchange, focused on market data, analytics and market infrastructure. In 2025 it invested in Juniper Square and led FinCom’s Series B. The theme matches our radar, but its average investment is around USD 5 million.

#ConditionScoreIn plain words
C1Really invests7Invests actively: new deals in the last 12 months.
C2Fresh fund available6A fund still deploying, without fresh capital.
C3Fair terms6Usual terms, without special transparency.
C4Network and help8A strong network: mentors, co-investors, customers.
C5Follow-on investing6Sometimes follows on.
C6Proven record6A few good exits.
C7Right ticket5The first cheque is at the upper limit of what we need.
C8Founders come back5A good reputation among founders.
C9Thesis fits8Invests exactly in fintech, financial data or education.
C10Access for us4Does not invest in our region.
C11Media (non-linear)6Moderate attention.
C12Investment pace5A steady pace.
C13Crowding (inverse)6Moderate competition.
C14Low risks8Low risks.

Sources: CB Insights, Nasdaq Ventures; Finviz, investiția în Juniper Square

Nasdaq Ventures: correct your score, score us or propose a call →

Augmentum Fintech · rounds of a few million pounds · 1/14 · score 4.70 · Form without substance

The only fintech fund listed in London, with investments in Tide and Gemini, which in 2025 led a GBP 4.5 million round in the investment platform RetailBook. In May 2026 it was taken over by Frontier Bidco for GBP 185.7 million, and its strategy after the takeover is not yet clear. It is on the list as an example of an investor whose thesis fits but who is uncertain now.

#ConditionScoreIn plain words
C1Really invests4No new investments announced recently.
C2Fresh fund available2Old fund, mostly invested.
C3Fair terms6Usual terms, without special transparency.
C4Network and help6A useful network, without special programmes.
C5Follow-on investing5Sometimes follows on.
C6Proven record6A few good exits.
C7Right ticket4The first cheque is far too large for a start-up like ours.
C8Founders come back5A good reputation among founders.
C9Thesis fits8Invests exactly in fintech, financial data or education.
C10Access for us4Does not invest in our region.
C11Media (non-linear)5Moderate attention.
C12Investment pace3Fewer and fewer new investments.
C13Crowding (inverse)6Moderate competition.
C14Low risks3High risks: change of control, restructuring or a fund near its end.

Sources: LSE, Frontier Bidco finalizează preluarea Augmentum; Cision, raportul anual Augmentum 2025

Augmentum Fintech: correct your score, score us or propose a call →

The investors’ replies

We publish the replies we receive here, with the senders’ consent, together with the corrections made at their request. The invitation has been open since 5 November 2026.

The data behind the scores

Conditions met out of 14, by investor (conditions). Source: Radar Active Explozive, instantaneul investitorilor, retrieved on 2026-11-05. The scores and the source of each are in the details below.

What the analysis shows

Fil Rouge Capital fits best (12 of 14 conditions). Investors with both a cheque that fits our stage and real access from Romania: Fil Rouge Capital, Seedcamp, Speedinvest, EBRD Star Venture, Startup Wise Guys, Inovo Venture Partners, Techstars, 500 Emerging Europe. The funds whose thesis is closest to ours (fintech, financial data, capital markets) are Speedinvest, Startup Wise Guys, QED Investors, CommerzVentures, Finch Capital, Anthemis Group, DB1 Ventures, Nasdaq Ventures, Augmentum Fintech, but most of them come in only once a company has revenue, or do not invest in our region. The practical order is therefore: first the pre-seed funds and programmes active in Romania, then the large seed funds, and the fintech specialists after the first revenue.

The list shows fit on public sources, not an agreement: none of these investors has assessed us or promised to invest. This is not investment advice.

How we apply the 14 conditions in this domain

The same algorithm as for crypto, companies and commodities: each condition gets a score from 0 to 10 and is met from 7. The weights are identical in every domain; only what we measure in practice changes.

#ConditionWhat we measureWeight
C1Really investsNew investments announced in the last 12 months, not just a fund on paper.16%
C2Fresh fund availableA recently closed fund with money still to invest.6%
C3Fair termsPublic, standard terms, no aggressive structures for founders.6%
C4Network and helpMentors, co-investors and access to customers, not just money.8%
C5Follow-on investingReserves for later rounds: stays with its portfolio.6%
C6Proven recordExits and large companies grown from the start.8%
C7Right ticketThe first cheque fits a pre-seed or seed start-up (up to about EUR 1.5 million).8%
C8Founders come backPortfolio founders recommend it or invest in its funds themselves.4%
C9Thesis fitsInvests in fintech, financial data, capital markets or financial education.6%
C10Access for usInvests in Romania or Central and Eastern Europe, with open applications.6%
C11Media (non-linear)Balanced attention; a very famous name draws thousands of applications.6%
C12Investment paceThe number of new investments is rising or steady.6%
C13Crowding (inverse)How many founders compete for the same attention: the acceptance rate.6%
C14Low risksNo restructuring, change of control, scandals or a fund near its end.8%

Questions about the reasoning

Do you disagree with a score, or want to know why an asset is where it is? Ask. We answer with the weekly update, with sources, by email and, if you agree, here on the page.

Answered questions

Loading…

Sources

The sources will be listed here together with the data.

How we check the data →